[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lojban] sticky hypothesis
- To: "Lionel Vidal" <nessus@free.fr>, "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: RE: [lojban] sticky hypothesis
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:37:09 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <000e01c267a2$3807e6c0$dac70950@ftiq2awxk6>
{da'i fu'e <sentences>}, I think.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lionel Vidal [mailto:nessus@free.fr]
> Sent: 29 September 2002 11:22
> To: Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com
> Subject: [lojban] sticky hypothesis
>
>
> Is there a grammatical device to make some hypothesis
> marked by {da'i} sticky? I would like to be able to sate
> an hypothesis in the {da'i} sense, then to express
> a bunch of bridis all dependent of it but not connected in
> any other way, and then to reverse to normal discourse.
> Or in other words, something like the sticky tag used for tense,
> adapted to discursives.
> (The context of all this is a tentative translation of some mathematical
> text, where the validity of an hypothesis may run for some times,
> before being proved or disproved)
> Any ideas?
>
> mu'omi'e lioNEL
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>