[lojban] Re: What the heck is this crap?

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

Robin:
> > > This isn't a nit-pick, this is a fundamental semantic change from
> > > the nature of the language xod and I have been speaking
> >
> > As I was saying to xod, it perhaps reflects a difference between those
> > who learnt Lojban from the book,
>
> Which, by the way, is how I learned it; I'm not sure which you were
> meaning to imply?

I was meaning that there's one group (which includes you) who learnt
it from the book and another group (which includes me) who learnt it
from the list and the vlaste. You end up with a weird situation
whereby someone like Jordan knows the book inside out, but doesn't know
stuff that was part of common lore but never got documented, while
I, for example, have only a hazy familiarity with the book, but am
comparatively well versed in the undocumented lore.

> > and those who learnt it from the wordlists and from discussion on
> > Lojban list. You have every right to tune out of technical discussions
> > -- Lojban won't be viable if the only way to learn it is to keep up
> > with the technical discussions -- but you do either have to accept
> > that you have your own Naturalist dialect (Soft Lojban) or that there
> > are inadequately documented bits of the language that you haven't yet
> > learnt and can't be expected to until better documentation and
> > teaching materials come along
>
> Heh.  When are those going to be written, again?  8)

... and in another message:
> > > I repeat my request for an errata
> >
> > It's not an erratum. It falls outside the scope of what the book
> > promises to deliver. (The book does deliver what it promises.)
>
> The book is horredously misleading in key places
>
> At the very least, could the High And Mighty Masters write this stuff
> down somewhere?

I will set up a wiki page where we can at least record things that
there need to be teaching materials for. Then the pedagoically-minded
can write up those materials. As I said, I'm pretty hazy about what
is and isn't in the book, so compiling a list of stuff that is
actually established but documented would be a useful first step.

It is here, to be added to:

http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?List%20of%20expository%20materials%20needed
%20to%20augment%20Woldy

with ideally links to expositions that people will generously
provide.
--And.