[lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?

["Avital Oliver" <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>]

Ok, everyone.
I sucked again.

{mo mi e do} is just as good as {mo fa mi e do}
Any answer to the former can be given a "se" at the beginning and be an
answer to the latter.

...


----- Original Message -----
From: "And Rosta" <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
To: "olivera" <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Is .e == .ije?


> >>> Avital Oliver <olivera@macs.biu.ac.il> 11/25/02 10:56pm >>>
> > #Actually, it would be {mo fi mi e do}. Other than that I like your
> solution.
> > What would be {mo fi mi e do}? What's wrong with {mo mi e do} and
> > {mo mi ije go'i do}?
> Sorry, I totally sux0red. I meant {mo fa mi e do}.
> ---------------------------------
>
> I still don't see anything wrong with {mo mi e do}, unless for some weird
> reason you want the answer to be nothing but a predicate in which mi e do
> fills the x1.
>
> --And.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>