Re: [lojban] Re: How would you say "plural" and "singular"?

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la noras cusku di'e

> But, pamei valsi seems to imply that "dog" is a single-word concept (as
> opposed to, for example "hot dog", which is a two-word concept).

I agree.

> I'd try
> for something like pamei sumti valsi (trying for "singleton-sumti word")
> for singular.

But that suggests things like {blanu}, which are single-sumti
words.

Tanru will always be too ambiguous for this sort of thing.
They can be used only if context makes it fairly clear what
we're talking about.

I suggest:

 zoi gy dog gy sinxa lo'e pamei
 "Dog" refers to a singleton.
 zoi gy dog gy pavysinxa
 "Dog" is singular.

 zoi gy dogs gy sinxa lo'e za'umei
 "Dogs" refers to a more-than-one-tuple.
 zoi gy dogs gy za'u zei sinxa
 "Dogs" is plural.

(How come there's no rafsi for {za'u}?) But how do we say
that "dog" and "dogs" are related by the singular-to-plural
relationship, i.e. "dog" is-the-singular-of "dogs" and
"dogs" is-the-plural-of "dog"? Maybe something like:

 zoi gy dog gy pa zei za'u zei ckini zoi gy dogs gy
 "Dog" is in one - more-than-one - relationship to "dogs".

Another possibility is:

  zoi gy dog gy pavysinxa sera'a zoi gy dogs gy
  "Dog" is singular with respect to "dogs".

> Plural is not as simple.  Some languages have more than one
> type of plural (Russian 2-4 is sometimes different from 5-or-more); and, as
> I noted in "le glibau cu cizra" on the Wiki, zero takes the PLURAL (at
> least in English).

Maybe singular/non-singular is a better descriprion for English.
The we can say {pavysinxa} and {nalpavysinxa} and avoid {za'u}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus