[lojban] Re: response to And

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

And Rosta scripsit:

> Is the sentence "This teddy is a cribe" 100% true? Not if cribe
> means 'bear'.

Well, in fact I find the sentence "This teddy is a bear" perfectly reasonable
and am quite ready to believe it.  To me, bears are categorized as the
brown/grizzly, the American black, the polar, the panda, and the stuffed.
And perhaps other categories, and indeed Irene's Larry is +stuffed +polar.
So for me "la laris. pe la .airin. cribe" is true.

Now I grant that Larry is not a prototypical bear, and I may even say
"Larry is not a real bear", where "real" means something like -fictional
-stuffed.

> I have often had the experience of one person asking "what does cmavo
> X mean", and other people racking their heads as to what, given the
> minimal info in CLL and the mahoste, it could possibly mean. Often
> the process takes the form "Well, we have no idea what it could mean,
> so let's invent a meaning that seems useful and is compatible with
> Woldy and the mahoste". These are the cases I'd prefer to leave to
> Usage's Decision.

You suffer from this because your notion of "meaning" is disconnected from
real meaning, i.e. pragmatic meaning.  (That is to say, you suffer for your
bad philosophy.)

> I notice myself and many others engaging in syllable counting as a
> heavily weighted criterion for stylistically evaluating a sentence.

Ack pfft!


-- 
We call nothing profound                        jcowan@reutershealth.com
that is not wittily expressed.                  John Cowan
        --Northrop Frye (improved)              http://www.reutershealth.com

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/