[lojban] Re: [jboske] Re: lo'edu'u

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Robert LeChevalier scripsit:

> The concept that what we say is unrelated to what we think (or how we think 
> for that matter) seems mind-bogglingly wrong, which is probably why SWH is 
> accepted by assumption by most people who presume that language structure 
> determines what we say.

BTW, this week's edition of _New Scientist_ magazine has a cover article on
neo-neo-Whorfianism, positioned as anti-Chomskyism.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/