[lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags)

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:30PM +0200, robin wrote:
> > Adam Raizen wrote:
> > >la djorden. cusku di'e
> > >
> > >>I'm not a LLG member, so I can't official propose this for the next
> > >>meeting (afaik).  However, as a member of the community I would like
> > >>to ask that at the next LLG meeting the "lojban is loglan" statement
> > >>be considered for revokation.
> > >
> > >
> > >There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
> > >this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
> > >effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to Loglan,
> > >so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
> > >straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
> > >clarification is in order, though.
> > >
> >
> > How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan".  Or
> > "development" or whatever.
>
> Sounds good to me.



Or that Lojban is a language in the Lojban family.




-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.