On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:55 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:30PM +0200, robin wrote:
Adam Raizen wrote:
la djorden. cusku di'e
I'm not a LLG member, so I can't official propose this for the next
meeting (afaik). However, as a member of the community I would
like
to ask that at the next LLG meeting the "lojban is loglan"
statement
be considered for revokation.
There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to
Loglan,
so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
clarification is in order, though.
How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan". Or
"development" or whatever.
Sounds good to me.
-Robin
I like John Cowan's better: "lojban is a Loglan."