[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi preti
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi preti
- From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:12:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <0212141233150J.03697@neofelis>
At 12:33 PM 12/14/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
According to the Book (or at least the downloadable version), a brivla may
not contain a cluster of more than three consonants, and the second pair in a
cluster must be an initial consonant pair. These rules are violated by the
undefined fu'ivla {bongnanba} and by many type-3 fu'ivla such as
{matcrflokati} and {cidjrspageti}. The rule as I understand it is that there
may not be more than three consonants other than 'r', 'l', 'n', and 'm' in a
row. The rule as implemented in vlatai is that there may not be more than
three non-vocalic consonants in a row, where 'r', 'n', 'l', or 'm' is a
vocalic consonant iff it is between two consonants. Thus {damskrima}, which I
deem valid, is rejected by vlatai, while it accepts {dapmskrima} and
{dasktrsktima}. What is the correct rule?
Nora is of the opinion (which I would probably agree with if I thought
about it) that Cowan (and I before him) were not considering fu'ivla when
writing most of the morphology rules, because then as now, fu'ivla were
considered unimportant fill-ins that did not need careful definition (and
indeed such definition was probably impossible). Actually, I think we
thought of fu'ivla as being closer to names in terms of rules than brivla.
If you look in the section on fu'ivla (pardon the codes, since this came
from the master copy with indexing codes, etc.
<cx "fu'ivla, construction of"><cx "fu'ivla, form of">The form of a
fu'ivla reliably distinguishes it from both the gismu and the cmavo. Like
cultural gismu, fu'ivla are generally based on a word from a single
non-Lojban language. The word is borrowed(actually copied, hence the
Lojban tanru fukpi valsi) from the other language and Lojbanized the
phonemes are converted to their closest Lojban equivalent and
modifications are made as necessary to make the word a legitimate Lojban
fu'ivla-form word. All fu'ivla:
<p>
****************************************
<cx "fu'ivla, rules for formation of"><cx "fu'ivla, initial consonant
cluster in"><dl compact><dt>1) <dd>must contain a consonant cluster
in the first five letters of the word; if this consonant cluster is at the
beginning, it must either be a permissible initial consonant pair, or a
longer cluster such that each pair of adjacent consonants in the cluster
is a permissible initial consonant pair: spraileis acceptable, but not
ktraileor trkaile;
*****************************************
<p><dt>2) <dd>must end in one or more vowels;
</dl><cx "slinku'i test, definition"><dl compact><dt>3) <dd>must not
be gismu or lujvo, or any combination of cmavo, gismu, and lujvo;
furthermore, a fu'ivla with a CV cmavo joined to the front of it must not
have the form of a lujvo (the so-called slinku'i test, not discussed
further in this book);
</dl><ex "syllabic pronunciations of consonants, in fu'ivla"><cx "y,
prohibition from fu'ivla"><dl compact><dt>4) <dd>cannot contain y,
although they may contain syllabic pronunciations of Lojban consonants;
</dl><cx "fu'ivla, stress in"><dl compact><dt>5) <dd>like other
brivla, are stressed on the penultimate syllable.
**************************************************
</dl><cx "fu'ivla, consonant clusters in">Note that consonant triples or
larger clusters that are not at the beginning of a fu'ivla can be quite
flexible, as long as all consonant pairs are permissible. There is no need
to restrict fu'ivla clusters to permissible initial pairs except at the
beginning.
****************************************************
<p>
<cx "fu'ivla, categorized contrasted with uncategorized in ease of
construction"><cx "borrowings, Stage 3 contrasted with Stage 4 in ease of
construction">This is a fairly liberal definition and allows quite a lot
of possibilities within fu'ivla space. Stage 3 fu'ivla can be made easily
on the fly, as lujvo can, because the procedure for forming them always
guarantees a word that cannot violate any of the rules. Stage 4 fu'ivla
require running tests that are not simple to characterize or perform, and
should be made only after deliberation and by someone knowledgeable about
all the considerations that apply.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org