[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 11:46:04PM +0000, Martin Bays wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 01:33:18PM +0000, Martin Bays wrote:
>
> > > .i le pu'u mi mi'e. maten. cilre fi la lojban. masti li so'u
> >
> > stidi lo'u cu masti le'u
> >
>
> drani .u'u .i do mi ba'o mulfa'igau le du'u lo si'o sucta se cusku to
> mu'u toi cu kakne lo nu seltau .i ki'e
je'e to milxe stidi zo mu'a toi
> > > .i le preti zo'u zoi gy.
> > >
> > > Is a jek-connected tanru like {ricfu je ninmu} still a single
> > > selbri? And in that case, what is its place structure, given that
> > > {ricfu} and {ninmu} have quite different place structures?
> >
> > Yes, and:
> >
> > n1/r1 is a rich man who is wealthy in aspect r2
>
> Oh dear, that's not what other people have been saying. And I'm not
> sure I like it either. Though I can see that cfujveni'u would have
> that place structure.
.u'uro'a
That's cuz I got it from jbofi'e. 8)
> > > What's the difference between {LE broda pe BAI LE brode} and {LE
> > > broda be BAI LE brode}?
> >
> > The former is associated with BAI LE brode, which IMO doesn't make a
> > lot of sense in most cases, and the latter adds a BAI place
> > containing LE brode to the bridi wrapped up in the outer LE.
> >
>
> Yes, that's how I'd understood pe clauses, so I was very confused when
> I first saw a pe BAI construction. The distinction Pierre Abbat draws
> earlier in the thread is interesting, however (though I don't really
> see how it's derived from "normal" pe usage)
A lot of things Pierre says confuse me. This should not, in any way,
be taken as an insult of Pierre.
> > > The "imaginary journey" idea doesn't seem to make much sense for
> > > some FAhA cmavo, such as fa'a, to'o, zo'i. What does {fa'a broda}
> > > mean?
> >
> > broda occurs towards an unspecified place, i.e. between me and
> > there.
> >
> > > Or indeed {fa'a mo'i broda}?
> >
> > broda occurs whilst moving towards an unspecified place.
> >
> > > How about {broda fa'a ko'a}?
> >
> > broda occurs between here and ko'a, most likely. Or pointing
> > towards it; not sure.
> >
>
> That makes sense, but it upsets the usual equivalence between {FAhA broda}
> and {broda FAhA mi}.
I don't think you mean 'equivalence'; if you do, you are wrong.
broda be'a ko'a == broda occurs to the north of ko'a (I think)
be'a broda == broda occurs to the north of the observer
> > > Is there any general rule for where events happens for the
> > > purposes of spatial tenses? For example, if I say {mi ca'u catlu},
> > > as I understand it that means the {mi catlu} is true at a point in
> > > front of me. But does that mean I'm looking at something in front
> > > of me, or that (paradoxically) I'm in front of myself as I look,
> > > or what?
> >
> > Neither. It means that in front of you, you are a cat. Which is
> > incredibly silly. But AFAIK no observer is specified.
>
> Ummm... catlu, not mlatu.
Oh, true. 8)
> [Snipping interesting stuff]
> >
> > So
> >
> > li ma'o fy. pa jo'i re jo'i ci
> >
> > appears to work; this treats jo'i as infix, which may or may not be
> > correct.
>
> jbofi'e says no.
rlpowell@chain> jbofihe -x
li ma'o fy. pa jo'i re jo'i ci
Warning: Sentence may be missing selbri at line 1 column 1?
[(li /No./ ma'o /operand to operator/ fy /f/ pa /1/ jo'i /array/ re /2/ jo'i /array/ ci /3/)]
jbofihe version V0_38
> [more snip]
> >
> > ce'o doesn't work in mex, nor do any of the set operators, which is
> > *insane*. I have *no* idea how to do set math in lojban. jo'i is
> > *certainly* not it. If I knew how to get JOI to work in mex, that
> > would be fixable, but I've no idea how to do that. If we can't make
> > JOI work in mex, then we either need to add set and sequence
> > operations to mex, or I'm going to throw my weight on the "mex are
> > totally useless" side of the argument.
> >
>
> Umm... you can have JOI connected operands (see e.g. CLL18.17.10)...
> whether this is an acceptable way of doing mathematical sequences I
> don't know, though I'd assumed it was.
li vei pa ce re ce ci ve'o vu'u re
works in jbofihe. As do a few other examples. I'm sorry, you're
absolutely right.
Oddly enough,
li ma'o fy. pa jo'i re ce ci
works but
li ma'o fy. pa ce re ce ci
does not. Anyone know why?
li ma'o fy. vei pa ce re ce ci
does work, though, and I can accept that, although I'm more likely to
use jo'i. Now if I just had math stuff to write in lojban... Any
ideas? I was toying a bit with Einstein's original Relativity paper.
As an added bonus, "li pa ce re ce ci vu'u re" appears to be equivalent
to the version with vei and ve'o, and satisfies my concerns about lojban
not having all set operations; if anyone things that the above does
*not* evaluate to "pa ce ci", please let me know.
Now, on to the general set problems.
Unfortunately, that doesn't fix the general set problems. In
particular, if we have:
le pamoi gerku ce remoi gerku ce cimoi gerku ku ku'a le remoi gerku ce
vomoi gerku
I'm not sure how to turn that into a set subtraction, without which we
do *not* have a complete set (ha ha) of general set operators.
Some ideas, comments requested:
le pamoi gerku ce remoi gerku ce cimoi gerku ku ku'a ni'u le remoi gerku
le pamoi gerku ce remoi gerku ce cimoi gerku ku ku'a da'a le remoi gerku
le pamoi gerku ce remoi gerku ce cimoi gerku ku ku'a nai le remoi gerku
I think I like da'a the best, but they all suck, IMO. Having a cmavo
for set subtraction seems reasonable.
While I'm at it, does anyone see a difference between
le pamoi gerku ce remoi gerku ce cimoi gerku ku ku'a le remoi gerku ce
vomoi gerku
and
le pamoi gerku ku ce le remoi gerku ku ce le cimoi gerku ku ku'a le
remoi gerku ku ce le vomoi gerku
? (The latter having a lot more ku). I'm pretty sure they're
equivalent, but I want to check.
> > As the only B.Math here, AFAIK, I'd like to think that my weight
> > matters in this case. 8)
>
> Give me a few months, and I'm afraid I'll be a BMath in all but
> name... and give me another year and I should be an MMath. And then
> I'll outrank you! Hee-hee.
An actual M.Math, or an M.Sc. in Math? If an actual M.Math, what
school?
> I have actually tried to do a little translation of logic/set theory
> stuff into lojban... but not without difficulty. And I found normal
> bridi more useful than mex - but then I haven't really fully absorbed
> that chapter yet.
<nod>
I would like to translate something mathematical and substantial; got any
contacts that would like to let us release a translated paper?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi