[lojban] Re: loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e

[Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>]

On Wednesday 29 January 2003 18:53, And Rosta wrote:
> Robin:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:08:40AM +0000, Martin Bays wrote:
> > > Yes, but the examples there (as far as I can see) all apply to DA. And
> > > the scope of a DA cmavo, as the CLL says I forget where, is very short
> > > - and in particular an {.i} (as opposed to an ijek/ijoik) cancels all
> > > DA assignments - and since you can only have a prenex at the start of
> > > a statement, not after an ijek/ijoik, your prenexed DA will never have
> > > a previous assignment (except what about sub-bridi, say in a du'u? Can
> > > DA assignments descend?)
>
> The rule applied in Academic Lojban is that DA is bound in the localmost
> bridi it occurs in, and the binding lasts for as long as the bridi does.
> For DA stay bound across sentence boundaries requires use of tu'e.

The bridi, or the jufra?

phma