[lojban] Re: jbovlaste issues

["Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>]

>> >But we've got some basic infrastructure set up, and I hear tell a lot of
>> >the issues are being hackup up on jboske
>>
>> Some of us (me, and I know a few others exist though I can't remember
names)
>> have no intention of joining jboske, but I at least did answer the call
for
>> bpfk members. Therefore, jboske is *not* the place for such discussions

>Jboske is the forum for technical discussion of Lojban, the BF forum
>is for taking decisions about what amendments to the baseline the BF
>should recommend. Most of those decisions require prior technical
>discussion, so anyone wanting to be party to that discuss should
>join jboske.

As I have said, my complaint came from a misreading of Robin as implying
that jboske was making decisions. The bpfk should make any decisions that
must be made, and will. Jboske should discuss, and does.