[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: ynai
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:41:37PM -0400, Craig wrote:
> >{mi viska le bloti y nai} is grammatical according to jbofi'e, but {mi
> viska
> >le bloti nai} is not. Is it correct?
>
> The nai bonds to the y. NAI never bond to a word other than the immediately
> preceeding one. Thus, mi viska le bloti ynai means "I see the boat (and I
> don't hesitate to say so)" whereas mi viska le bloti nai is ungramatical. I
> have been unable to find Y being negated in this way in any real use,
> however.
That's icky. Saying "uh" should not change the grammar of the sentence.
It should be pre-parsed out like word+SI.
--
mu'o mi'e y rab.spir