On Friday 18 April 2003 18:30, Craig wrote:
> >".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated?
>
> Y shouldn't be negatable. Y is not negatable in actual usage. The Book does
> not mention Y being negatable. Jbofi'e thinks Y is negatable. Jordan tells
> me that the BNF disagrees. Hrm, looks like Y is not negatable.
What about {mi viska le bloti .ui .y. nai}?