[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one.
- To: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one.
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 07:26:57 -0400
- Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- In-reply-to: <p05210623bae8ef7180c3@[128.250.86.174]>
- References: <p05210623bae8ef7180c3@[128.250.86.174]>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Nick Nicholas scripsit:
> Should any BPFK-sponsored publication (such as a supplement to CLL)
> mention Latin-based alt orthographies? Or the other ones? My
> suspicion is no; anyone have strong feelings on the subject?
Well, CLL itself mentions one Latin-based alt orthography, a political
football that promptly sank. My sense is that one such football is enough.
--
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan
in any language. --Allen Brown jcowan@reutershealth.com