[lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one.

[Jay F Kominek <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:18:05PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > Should any BPFK-sponsored publication (such as a supplement to CLL) 
> > mention Latin-based alt orthographies? Or the other ones? My 
> > suspicion is no; anyone have strong feelings on the subject?
> 
> pe'i BPFK should put forward the motion that any orthography that
> corresponds unambiguously to the official one should be deemed to
> fall within prescription-conformant usage. Many people have strong
> feelings about the official orthography -- some people loathe it, others
> loathe any deviation from it. I think that these sorts of battles should
> be negotiated through usage.

xb encyv gebpv

-- 
Jay Kominek <jkominek@miranda.org>
If at first you don't succeed,
Increase the amperage.