[lojban] Re: bpfk vs jbovlaste

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

la nitcion cusku di'e

> And the bottom line is, if people want canonical expressions for 
> 'parasite', they have to propose them to jbovlaste, and give people a 
> canonical alternative. 

Very wise words.

> The bpfk in my view has the same task with 
> Jorge's non-baseline usages. I think Jorge is damaging Lojban by 
> deviating from the baseline, but if I am to combat this legitimately, I 
> need to provide Jorge with baseline-compatible alternatives, so that he 
> can say what he legitimately needs to say. 

Right. I don't agree I'm damaging Lojban with my usage, obviously.
I think my non-baseline compliant usage is much more beneficial to
Lojban than all the baseline compliant non-usage put together. Also,
I think that my usage happens to be more baseline compliant than most 
people's, even though baseline compliance is not a high priority for me. 

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com