[lojban] Re: emotions

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

la djorden cusku di'e
> > > > > I think this all rests on a fundamental misunderstanding of lojban
> > > > > word classes.  People like to think about gismu, cmavo and lujvo.
> > > > > But it's actually brivla, cmavo and cmene. 
[...]
> > cmavo is not a syntactic class, it is a morphological class.
> 
> It is also a class of syntactic classes.  (And as you hopefully can
> tell, that is to what I was refering).

Then you were wrong. The preference for gismu is for morphological, not
for syntactical reasons.

> > Hmm... {parji} doesn't seem to limit any increase in future rafsi
> > availability, because par, paj, pai, pa'i are all already taken.
> [...]
> 
> It takes the "parj" rafsi.

But there is no shortage of those.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com