[lojban] Re: emotions

[Rob Speer <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:46:12AM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 5/26/03 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> >It's disyllabic. There is no shortage of bisyllabic cmavo space.
> 
> No one has been hurt, so far as I know, by "le du'u"/"le se du'u" and 
> "la'edi'u" being longer than one syllable, and I can imagine few things 
> that need a shorter one.

Does it fit within the BPFK guidelines to make "lau" mean "la'edi'u"?
Sure, it's an arbitrary change that has no usage so far, but for one
thing it would be very useful, and for another thing "lau" has never had
any usage anyway, and I can't even imagine what it would be used for.
-- 
mu'o mi'e rab.spir