[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: bpfk vs jbovlaste
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:32:43PM +1000, Nick Nicholas wrote:
> But jbovlaste was not initially intended to be an arm of the bpfk, and
> the bpfk is nowhere near undertaking any review of it. Furthermore,
> those seditious, baseline-undermining souls who have been entering
> exptal gismu have nonetheless had the courtesy to clearly label them as
> such
Actually, the program labels them as such. No choice is given.
Repeating what I said in the other thread: jbovlaste will be revised
to disallow experimental words in the dictionary output.
-Robin
--
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me"
-- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org
http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui