RE: [lojban] Digest Number 1752

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> Nick Nicholas scripsit:
> 
> > Moreover, any objections (and there have been many) lambast the whole 
> > of MEX, and MEX cmavo have few defenders. Most prominently you, in 
> > fact; the only other I can think of who is on record as not minding 
> > them is Robin.CA. 
> 
> I'll go on record as favoring MEX cmavo too 

Believe it or not, I've never been among those with a big downer on
MEX. It's quite neatly circumscribed, easy to ignore, and doesn't
interfere with the rest of the language. I class it among the optional
extra bells and whistles. Compare this to the disaster area the gadri
system currently is -- there's no contest.

==And.