[lojban] Re: le mulno lerfu jufra

["Philip Newton" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

de'i li 2003:5:27 ti'u li 18:28 la sanxiyn. cu cusku di'e

> lu le fagri ne'i le bidju patxu ka'e cizysmu li vore li'u
> cu mulno lerfu jufra bau la lojban.

On an unrelated note, you've used {bau la lojban.} for this, and also 
in a recent post where you remarked (paraphrasing) that {zo mroji'e cu 
valsi bau la lojban.}.

Both {valsi} and {jufra} have a place for the language, so you could 
have stated that {zo mroji'e cu valsi fi la lojban.} and {lu li'o li'u 
cu mulno lerfu jufra fi la lojban.}

I'm not sure whether you were aware of that or whether you used {bau} 
for stylistic reasons.

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
filip.niutyn. <pnewton@gmx.de>