[lojban] Re: Beginner's take on the open/closed gismu debate (was: Re: emotions)

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- tk1@despammed.com wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> [Jorge Llamb?as:]
> 
> > > I am thinking of replacing the last two words with e.g. "solji skapi"...
> > > which still leaves two syllables for random interjections.
> > But it won't rhyme with rebla...
> 
> I saw that too, but I thought, interjections can come at the end too... :)

But there are no interjections ending in -ebla... :(

> > {ro da go nanmu gi remna gi'e nakni} is exactly the same as both
> > of the lojbo-ified versions of the formula so far.
> 
> ¿oiro'e le narselci'a sumti crane cu na rinju xu?
> 
> Also, actually I introduced the y and z variables in the predicate logic
> because you earlier pointed out that {nakni} has three role places.

The go-gi-gi'e version is Jordan's, not mine.

It all depends on how precise you want to be. Without the
explicit variables it is not strictly equivalent to the
logical notation formula, but it still does serve as a definition.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com