[lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed.

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:18:02AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> I imagine Robin chose his words carefully, 

You must be thinking of a different Robin.

I am many things, but someone who usually chooses his words
carefully is, without question, not one of them.

> but, as you say, he does seem to be overstating the amount of
> conservatism required. But the fact is that the design of the BF
> relies on a reasonable amount of participation from 'both camps'
> but the change-averse camp has been rather silent. If the BF were
> constitutionally able to start making resolutions today, 

I'm sorry, umm, who says we're not able to do so, exactly?

> then those resolutions would be rather conspicuously
> unconservative, it seems. I'd have thought that it would have been
> enough for Robin to ask for active commissioners with an avowed
> aversion to tinkering, 

That would be fine, yes.

[snip]
> Is there an actual impasse? 

Nick seems to think so.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me"
-- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui