[lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed.

["Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>]

>> Second, I think the fact that both conservative and revisionist members
>are
>> active is precisely the reason why we aren't moving so fast. If everyone
>> were a naturalist, we'd have consensus-minus-one for several issues at
>this
>> point. This isn't a bad thing; we revisionists do need to be reined in a
>> bit. I'd say the real way to end the impasse is for people on both sides
>to
>> make concessions on some issues. For instance, I would dearly love to see
>> ka'enai become official, but I would give it up in a heartbeat if doing
so
>> meant that the more actively harmful issues were resolved prior to the
>heat
>> death of the universe.

>Is there an actual impasse? Or just an utter loss of momentum? I don't
know,
>but if there is an impasse it's hard to find evidence on phpbb that it has
>arisen from intransigent refusal to compromise.

Not refusal to compromise in theory; it's just that I have yet to see
everyone stand behind any compromise. And I'm including myself there.

 -- .kreig.daniyl.

"They didn't find it odd the Emporer was travelling around in a cart of
fish?"
 -rlpowell

ragnarok@pobox.com
teucer@bnomic.org