[lojban] Re: Shakespearian word order

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

la and cusku di'e
> > > > > > > xorxes:
> > > > > > > > > > > FOOL: All thy other titles thou hast given away:
> > > > > > > > > > >       That thou wast born with.
> > > > > > > > 2)   ro lo do drata noltcita do se bejdu'a zo'au ny poi do se
> > > jinzi
> > To get the unbound meaning I'd have to use an
> > explicit {tu'oboi ny} here. The only glorking is in identifying 
> > {ro lo do drata noltcita} as the antecedent, but bare {lo do drata 
> > noltcita} is not a candidate. I think.
> 
> Why is {lo do drata noltcita} not a candidate?

I'm not sure now. I guess I just took it for granted that if the 
interpretation of a pronoun as a bound variable is available, then it 
takes precedence over its interpretation as a constant.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com