[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Javacc
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: Javacc
- From: "thinkit41" <thinkit8@lycos.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:52:10 -0000
- In-reply-to: <049d01c38f57$31332cf0$6401a8c0@mauve>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, "David Barton" <dlb@p...> wrote:
>
> Anyone use Javacc? I was wondering if it could parse Lojban. It's a
> Java-based language parser that also features a tree builder (jjtree).
> I used it to write a complete interpreter for a c-like language.
>
> We've used Javacc. We did not find it particularly great, and
abandoned it for ANTLR. With great sighs of relief, I might add.
>
> Is there some reason you don't want to use the YACC grammar? Are
you writing in Java? You can certainly call C from Java. Frankly, I
prefer functional languages anyway, and would suggest moving to
Haskell and parser contructors.
>
> Dave Barton
Does Haskell allow decimal literals? I'm allergic to decimal and
don't want to see any decimal literals.