[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: {Archivist} Intention of gunma?

At 04:39 PM 10/15/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:45:56PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >
> > Was the intention of the definition of gunma to allow things
> > like:
> >
> >     le cecmu cu gunma mi
> >
> > Or do we need to do things like
> >
> >     le cecmu cu gunma lu'i mi ce da


le cecmu cu se pagbu mi

corresponds to what I think the first sentence is trying for.

The "intent" (however sloppy) was
le cecmu cu gunma mi joi da    (unless I am the only component of the mass).
but I believe current thinking would make it
le cecmu cu gunma mi ce da
I don't think that the lu'i is required, and it seems odd with no type-conversion and only 2 "members" listed. 

--
lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org