[lojban] Re: cfari

["John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Robin Lee Powell scripsit:

> Those of you without time/ability to read the Lojban might might the
> topic interesting: xorxes was pointing out four places where I used
> a COI cmavo as though it was UI (i.e., without following it with a
> name).  xorxes expressed his desire for COI cmavo to actually
> grammatically be like UI cmavo (which I'm inclined to agree with).

Well, UI binds to the previous word.  Is that what you were doing?
It's certainly grammatical to have COI by itself now, although you
need an explicit "do'u" if the next thing is a name or sumti.

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)