Re: [lojban] Unicode in Lojban?

[John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>]

Pierre Abbat scripsit:

> vencupilno ki'a? It is a valid type-4, but unlike {mantofasma} doesn't have an 
> obvious ve fu'ivla or meaning. It looks like two gismu stuck together, but 
> {vencu} doesn't mean anything and is probably a typo for {vecnu}. It could 
> also be a lujvo with a letter missing. Google draws a blank. What is it?

My guess is that it's a typo for "vecnu pilno", two words.

-- 
With techies, I've generally found              John Cowan
If your arguments lose the first round          http://www.reutershealth.com
    Make it rhyme, make it scan                 http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    Then you generally can                      jcowan@reutershealth.com
Make the same stupid point seem profound!           --Jonathan Robie