Re: [lojban] Re: Official parser problem?

[Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>]

On Thursday 18 March 2004 00:26, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> My goal is to produce a completely formalized grammar for Lojban
> (*including* the morphology) that has no pre-processor at all[2] and
> encodes something close enough to the current grammar as to invalidate
> no existing usage.

I have 144KB of morphology test cases, including some corner cases (e.g. 
{micytosmabru} vs. {mictosmarbu}). Would you like it now, or can you wait for 
the next valfendi release? The next release will have complete brivla 
validation, including optional fu'ivla rafsi lujvo, and I'll add more cases 
to test those. I'm currently implementing the tosmabru test.

phma
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.