[lojban] Re: Error in bnf.300

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 07:52:40PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> At 11:54 AM 3/21/04 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >But the "I jek" has already been eaten, so the appropriate parte of
> >paragraph can't match.  Oops, nowhere to go.  Oh well.
> >
> >(I know this occurs because I just watched my PEG parser do it
> >several times until I changed the ordering; it's fixed now, and is
> >the only Lojban parser I'm aware of that can parse "mi broda .i je bo
> >no da zo'u broda").
> 
> It prescriptively shouldn't be able to.  Under TECHFIX 45, the ability
> to put an unmarked prenex after an IJEK was specifically and
> intentionally removed.  

<blink>

Ummm, *OK*.  It's an example from the Reference Grammar.

    roda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da

Chapter 16, example 10.5.

I haven't easily been able to find Techfix 45.  Can you point me to it?

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui