[lojban] Re: Error in bnf.300

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:46:59PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> --- John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> >  Rather than trying to discriminate, we just rejected this form
> >  altogether, which was made possible by treating i and ijek
> >  separately.
> 
> Unfortunately that complicates the grammar and makes it more difficult
> to learn. I'm probably not going to remember that you can't have a
> prenex after ije/ibo/iseni'ibo/etc.

I will, but only because of the amount of work I put in to debugging the
problem.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui