[lojban] Re: "pu" versus "pu ku" and LR(1)

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:22:54PM -0500, jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
> Now in #3 and #4 the ordering is the same as in #1 and #2
> respectively, and presumably #3 = #1 and #4 = #2.  However, #3 and #4
> use tenses on the selbri rather than free-floating tense+KU.  If we
> apply the selbri-NA vs. NAKU rules, then #3 = #2 because the tense
> moves to the front of the prenex (outermost loop).

*Ick*.  OK, but no-one's sure what is actually supposed to be true in
the current language WRT this issue.

Hmmm.  May not be relevant; I'm going to respond to your original post
again.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui