John Leuner wrote:
[replying to me]
> > Looks plain enough to me: Lojban {djon.} may be a usable
> > lojbanisation of English _Joan_ [dZoUn] is nothing better
> > can be found, but it is not valid to pronounce {djon.} as
> > [dZoUn], only as [dZon] or [dZOn].
>
> If I understand this, you're saying that la djon. is what I want?
Yes, of course.
--Ivan