At 07:04 PM 4/6/04 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:48:39PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > The official parser does not appear to accept eks, of any form, > between 'li' sumti: > > li revo .a li pare > Last good construct was: quantifier_300 > > This includes 'ji'. I don't have the time now to investigate why. > > Adding 'ku' did not help, nor did boi. But "li revo lo'o .a li pare" works. jbofihe doesn't seem to need it, though.
It should, I think.With "li revo .a li pare", it appears like it should take LR(2) to look past the .a to see the "li", and know that we aren't trying "li revo .a pare"
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org