[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan."
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:16:18PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> On the proposed equivalence of "djan" and "me la djan", this would not
> in fact hold if CMENE=BRIVLA, since brivla "djan" could have more than
> one sumti. Instead, la/lai/la'i would simply become redundant.
There's a question for you: what is the place structure of a
cmene-cum-brivla?
Not that I actually *care*: proposals that invalidate past usage don't
get much truck from me. The question is intended to indicate that the
idea is a bit silly.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rocki morsi