[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: Opinions on "mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan."



On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:16:18PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> On the proposed equivalence of "djan" and "me la djan", this would not
> in fact hold if CMENE=BRIVLA, since brivla "djan" could have more than
> one sumti. Instead, la/lai/la'i would simply become redundant.

There's a question for you: what is the place structure of a
cmene-cum-brivla?

Not that I actually *care*: proposals that invalidate past usage don't
get much truck from me.  The question is intended to indicate that the
idea is a bit silly.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rocki morsi