[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Official parser and "lo ni'a zu crino"
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:48:46AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- jcowan@reutershealth.com wrote:
> >
> > I will not support, however, any structural changes that *could* be
> > made as a result of going to infinite-lookahead grammar: no A/JA
> > merger, e.g. For one thing, human beings don't support infinite
> > lookahead. But I am okay with accepting things like "le broda joi
> > le brodi", since that is not truly an ambiguity but just the result
> > of smarter resolution of elidable terminators than Yacc allows.
>
> Isn't that self-contradictory? Why is infinite-lookahead acceptable
> for JOI but not for JE?
Because JA/A is formalized in the grammar; elidable terminators are not.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rocki morsi