[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: y: what is it good for?



--- Nora LeChevalier <noras@cox.net> wrote:
> But that "single" word invalidates all the documentation on cmavo word 
> forms.  Cmavo currently can only be either a series of vowels or a single 
> consonant followed by a series of vowels (where "series of vowels" is  a 
> little up in the air as to what's acceptable).

CLL says:

> Standard cmavo occur in four forms defined by their word structure. 
> Here are some examples of the various forms:
>
>    V-form      .a  .e  .i  .o  .u
>    CV-form     ba  ce  di  fo  gu
>    VV-form     .au .ei .ia .o'u    .u'e
>    CVV-form    ki'a    pei mi'o    coi cu'u
>
> In addition, there is the cmavo ``.y.'' (remember that ``y'' is 
> not a V), which must have pauses before and after it.

So, ".y." already is an exception. (The other exception, ".y'y.", 
seems to have been forgotten here.)

In any case, while I admit "ybu" would be a wart type-of word, the
alternative seems worse to me: "You can hesitate between any pair 
of words except after "zo", before "bu", before or after "zei" or 
between "lo'u-le'u"". Hesitation is not something so easily
controllable. This would make zo-, bu- and zei-phrases especially
tight, such that they can't be broken by hesitation. Almost word-like.

(lo'u-le'u is included in the list above because when quoting words,
if {y} is counted as a word it makes a difference. For example
{lo'u a bu y zo y zoi le'u cu valsi xamei} is not equivalent
to {lo'u a bu zo zoi le'u cu valsi xamei}. {y} would make little or 
no difference inside a zoi quote because it is unanalyzable, and
inside lu-li'u it would be as irrelevant as <word> si. But inside 
lo'u-le'u it would count, also like si.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861