[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:56:02 -0700
In-reply-to: <20040602205243.56289.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040602174740.GS818@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040602205243.56289.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:52:43PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > Both jbofihe and the official parser choke on "li paxa se nanca" but
> > are fine with "li paxa nanca".  Does anyone know why?
> 
> LALR(1)? The parser gets to {li paxa se} and expects an operator?

Yeah, I forgot you could "se" and operator.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi

References:
- [lojban] Grammar: li paxa se nanca
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
  - From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: Protected Mail System
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread