reverendzow writes, and I forward: --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, xod <xod@t...> wrote:
so,reverendzow wrote:>What's a BPFK? I think such a change -could- happen, but to do
>the following would have to occur: Someone creates a new Lojban >vocabulary that has major improvements over the current one(although
>this is not necessarily possible), then the existing (andrelatively
>small as I understand it) Lojban community would need to beconvinced
>that this new vocabulary was worth the work in switching. $0.02> >I'm imagining a goulash containing Esperantoid vocabulary
(targetting
your preferred language group) and Lojbanic grammar. Do you expect
this
would gain more traction than Esperanto, or would that level of
success
satisfy you?
Yeep! This is not the direction I want to go at all. The first thing to look into is the phonetic inventory - what sounds most people in the world can produce/distinguish, including computers' ability to recognize/distinguish these sounds. This would then be followed by a study of the most efficient methods of preventing vocal confusion (i.e., making word boundaries obvious), combined with a method of making the most commonly-used/useful words the shortest. Then we could generate the new vocabulary.