[lojban] Re: no'o et al.: which BPFK section?

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- Pierre Abbat wrote:
> PA5 contains xo, ci'i, no'o, ka'o, pai, te'o, and tu'o. 
> Of these, ci'i, ka'o, pai, and te'o are mathematical constants, 

{fi'u} is also a mathematical constant in some contexts, though 
it is not in PA5. I think {ka'o} is more like {pi}, {ki'o}, {pi'e}, 
{fi'u} than like {pai} and {te'o}. {ka'o} separates the real from
the imaginary part of a complex number. That it defaults to
{no ka'o pa} is just like {ki'o} defaults to {pa ki'o no no no}.

> and no'o is in BPFK Section: 
> Inexact Numbers. Should no'o be in Mathematical Constants, or where 
> should xo and tu'o go?

I included no'o there because it can work as a quantifier, which
is the basic function of the "Inexact Numbers". {xo} and {tu'o} 
belong in a section of their own, obviously they have little to do 
with mathematical constants. I can include them with "Inexact 
Numbers" if you want.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush