[lojban] Re: jordis

[Martin Bays <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

* Tuesday, 2004-10-19 at 10:07 +0100 - Martin Bays <jboste@zugzwang.port5.com>:

> AFAICT, {me} has a pretty vague meaning. xorxes' entry to the lojban jbovlaste
> seems about right though:
>     galfi le se li'erla'i sumti lo brivla .i x[1] se sinxa le sumti
> 
> which would mean it is true that {mi me da poi vlapau dei} (since I am
> signified by {mi}), but it certainly isn't true that {mi du da poi vlapau
> dei}.

Sorry I got it very wrong there - x1 is a referent of the me'd sumti, not a
referent of its referent as my example sentence had it.

Now I remember why I stopped posting to this list - I *always* make
embarrassing mistakes...

Martin