John Cowan's view on reification

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

My view on Lojban's view of reification:

Everything that a sumti refers to, not within the scope of a negation, is
reified.  That includes abstract le nu/lo nu things, le'e things, lo'e things,
and the works.  You may perhaps find an exception to this general principle,
but I can probably explain it away.

Ya happy now, rlpowell?


-- 
"We are lost, lost.  No name, no business, no Precious, nothing.  Only empty.
Only hungry: yes, we are hungry.  A few little fishes, nassty bony little
fishes, for a poor creature, and they say death.  So wise they are; so just,
so very just."  --Gollum        jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan