[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: minimal lojban

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
From: Adam COOPER <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:31:08 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=a+Tav1ItyY5dQFdlhynwaOpt52MJ5wSyAC5jhJBT90wHw10alav6GOY526a+EG0DVZfgF5kouJS8PRyGq5/1kM6dslhyiVoOcbbhuUzQcklH1ILujuyYUf5TMSF540vjn8oEtp8aSlQ/4+TqS4kY+KmZiAk7SshUm9E1YR2wGKw=
In-reply-to: <BA62D4D0-6EE0-11D9-9B83-000A95C58224@xahlee.org>
References: <20050125140142.81370.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> <BA62D4D0-6EE0-11D9-9B83-000A95C58224@xahlee.org>
Reply-to: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

It's always seemed to me that most languages have their "extras" or
"frills" & Lojban's no exception. Evidentials can be expressed in
bridi. {tu'a} doesn't seem necessary. Off the top of my head it seems
that if you retain {bo} you can dump {ke ... ke'e}.

But I am dying to know what you're planning to do with, er, {lo
cmajbobau} . Is it a secret?

On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:52:26 -0800, xah lee <xah@xahlee.org> wrote:
> 
> i haven't learned about KOha, I, UI... but i know there are bo and (ke,
> ke'i)... surely lojban isn't complete without these??
> 
>   Xah
>   xah@xahlee.org
>   http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html

References:
- [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
  - From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
- Re: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
  - From: xah lee <xah@xahlee.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread