[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: minimal lojban
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:24:04PM -0800, xah lee wrote:
>
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > If a minimal Lojban includes tanru, you *must* have one or the
> > other, or you lose expressive power. As it seems to me that the
> > goas here is to produce a Kernel Language for Lojban (that is,
> > the most minimal set of Lojban from which all the rest of Lojban
> > can be described as just shortcuts), you don't want to lose
> > expressive power.
>
> Robin described my mind...
I'm a genius! The Human Level AI problem is solved!
*speaking from offstage*
What? Oh. Nevermind.
> (i don't think lojban is ever suitable for human communication as
> with natural languages.
Erm. Those of us on IRC seem to do just fine.
Do you have any basis for that opinion?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/