[lojban] Re: SE with conjunctions

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 07:07:11PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> SE is grammatical with both logical and non-logical conjunctions,
> but the only usage mentioned in the refgram is {se} with logical
> conjunctions, of which the only ones it makes a difference with
> are {u/ju/gi'u/gu'u/gu}. What does {te ju} mean? Does {se} make a
> difference with any JOI (I think it should with {ce'o}, {fa'u},
> and, if I understand it right, {pi'u})?

There should be, but is not, a set subtraction JOI; that would also
apply.

{se fa'u} is Really Cool.  Thanks for bringing that up.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/