RE: [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited

• To: <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>, <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
• Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited
• From: "Ben Goertzel" <ben@goertzel.org>
• Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:29:08 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <20050408232435.GR26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

• References:
  • [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited
    • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

• Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited
• Next by Date: [lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
• Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited
• Next by thread: [lojban] Re: Semantics of lojban and glibau, and Lojban FrameNet revisited
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread