[lojban] Re: "zo'e" for selbri.

[Jorge Llambías <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 4/28/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > co'e
> >
> That is appropriately unspecified but not quite
> the "obvious or indifferent" force of {zo'e}.
> Possibly {go'i}, which repeats the previous bridi
> (or, since it can be modified in various ays,
> selbri) comes closer.  But it is a bit too
> precise (informative).  Nothing seem to match
> {zo'e} more exactly -- and we don't have the
> luxury of a blank (which best matches {co'e}).

A blank selbri is grammatical for the main bridi, though
not for subordinate bridi. 

{go'i} matches {ri}, and {co'e} matches {zo'e}. I'm not 
sure I understand what you say {co'e} lacks, but then we 
don't seem to agree about {zo'e} in the first place anyway 
so that's not surprizing.

mu'o mi'e xorxes