Re: Supplicatory Model: "under conditions".

["opi_lauma" <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>]

--- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@y...> wrote:
> > 2. The x4 of zgana describes those conditions that
> must > be in place for the bridi to be true.
> Usually, I think, one does not imply that filled
> arguments of selbri are conditions that MUST be in
> place for bridi to be true. It means that bridi can be
> true if we replace given argument by another one. So
> why do we need to think that zgana is exception from
> rooles? So x4 should be understand just as "condition
> under whcih" x1 observe x2. And it should not mean
> that under another conditions x1 can observe x2.   
I wanted to say "And it should NOT mean that under another conditions
x1 canNOT observe x2."